U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Gregory Krug v. Victor Loranth

Gregory Krug v. Victor Loranth
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2016 · Shedd, Wynn, Floyd
669 F. App'x 675

Gregory Krug v. Victor Loranth

Opinion

*676 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Charles Krug appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Krug’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krug v. Loranth, No. 1:14-cv-01829-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We remanded for the limited purpose of p'er-mitting the district court to determine whether Krug’s notice of appeal should be construed as a motion to reopen the appeal period, and if so, whether reopening was merited. On remand, the district court granted Krug’s motion to reopen.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.