Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6895

MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his original

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition and opening a

new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending

below. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D.

W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished