Carlton Clay v. Carl Manis
Carlton Clay v. Carl Manis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6315
CARLTON CLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARL MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. HARMON, Institutional Hearing Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: October 19, 2016 Decided: October 24, 2016
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton Clay, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carlton Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL
(E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished