U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Carlton Clay v. Carl Manis

Carlton Clay v. Carl Manis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2016

Carlton Clay v. Carl Manis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6315

CARLTON CLAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARL MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. HARMON, Institutional Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL)

Submitted: October 19, 2016 Decided: October 24, 2016

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Clay, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Carlton Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.