United States v. Matthew James Dury

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Matthew James Dury

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-6841

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1)

Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016

Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his post-judgment motions to dismiss

indictment, for a new trial and for recusal. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2016; June 7,

2016). We deny Dury’s motion for default judgment and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished