Charles Langham v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charles Langham v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6252

CHARLES LANGHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LT. R. WRIGHT; ANGELA DUNBAR; OFFICER STOOTS; OFFICER MALONE; OFFICER BOYD; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SCOTT; MR. DUVALL, Psychologist; LIEUTENANT CHASE; TINA SCOTT; RENE DAUBON,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03143-BO)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: November 9, 2016

Before TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Langham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his

complaint raising claims pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act

(FTCA),

28 U.S.C. §§ 1346

(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant Langham leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order.

Langham v. United States, No. 5:14-ct-03143-BO (E.D.N.C. filed

Jan. 27, 2016 & entered Jan. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished