United States v. Samuel Holmes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Samuel Holmes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6635

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL RODNEY HOLMES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1)

Submitted: November 8, 2016 Decided: November 18, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Rodney Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Zalkin Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Rodney Holmes appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of its earlier order

granting him a sentence reduction under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2)

(2012). In the prior order, the district court reduced his

sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range. In his

motion for reconsideration, Holmes sought a further reduction. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Holmes, No. 1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1

(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished