Lynton Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lynton Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1674

LYNTON BALLENTINE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY; HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LP; JONATHAN CALEB ROGERS; SHANN ROSE SCHMIDT; CLAIRE COLLINS; NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY; HOLLY ROBINSON; SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY; KAREN BUMGARDNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynton Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se. Brian D. Boone, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Lacey Meredith Moore, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; Kacy Lynn Hunt, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth C. Stone, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lynton Ballentine appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Co., No.

3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2016). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished