Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1675
CHARLES T. LEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC)
Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles T. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Dustin Matthew Dow, John Bruce Lewis, BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Charles T. Lee appeals the district court’s order granting
the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v.
Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 11,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished