Angelo Irving v. Harold Clarke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Angelo Irving v. Harold Clarke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6705

ANGELO MARCELLUS IRVING,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cv-00571-JAG)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo Marcellus Irving, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Catherine Campbell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angelo Marcellus Irving appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reopen the time to appeal. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Irving v. Clarke, No. 3:14-cv-00571-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 29,

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished