United States v. Manoj Jha

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 22, 2016

Opinion

No. 16-6856

Plaintiff - Appellee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for

reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension

of time to file a response. We have reviewed the record and find

no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 (D.

Md. June 13, 2016). We deny Jha’s motion for sanctions and his

motion to vacate this court’s decision in United States v. Jha,

(4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4717). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.