Frankie McCoy, Sr. v. Patrick Conroy
Frankie McCoy, Sr. v. Patrick Conroy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6659
FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICK CONROY, Warden; THOMAS CORCORAN, Ex-Warden; CHARLES H. BRADBERRY, Case Manager; D. HOWARD, Case Manager; C. ALTON, Case Manager; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendants are sued individual and official capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
B. ALLEN, Supervisor Case Management,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cv-01581-JFM)
Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: November 23, 2016
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane- Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., filed a lawsuit in the district
court under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the
Rehabilitation Act, claiming that the Defendants discriminated
against him on account of his physical disabilities. The
district court granted summary judgment to the Defendants on the
ground that McCoy settled the asserted claims in a settlement
agreement reached in a prior action. McCoy now appeals.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McCoy v. Conroy, No. 1:01-cv-01581-JFM (D. Md. filed
Apr. 15, 2016; entered Apr. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished