Frankie McCoy, Sr. v. Patrick Conroy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Frankie McCoy, Sr. v. Patrick Conroy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6659

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; THOMAS CORCORAN, Ex-Warden; CHARLES H. BRADBERRY, Case Manager; D. HOWARD, Case Manager; C. ALTON, Case Manager; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendants are sued individual and official capacities,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

B. ALLEN, Supervisor Case Management,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cv-01581-JFM)

Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: November 23, 2016

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane- Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., filed a lawsuit in the district

court under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the

Rehabilitation Act, claiming that the Defendants discriminated

against him on account of his physical disabilities. The

district court granted summary judgment to the Defendants on the

ground that McCoy settled the asserted claims in a settlement

agreement reached in a prior action. McCoy now appeals.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. McCoy v. Conroy, No. 1:01-cv-01581-JFM (D. Md. filed

Apr. 15, 2016; entered Apr. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished