Steven Corbin v. Lee J. Loftus and JMO Finance
Steven Corbin v. Lee J. Loftus and JMO Finance
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Steven T. Corbin appeals the district court’s order granting Lee J. Loftus and JMO Finance Staffs motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and dismissing his complaint as to all parties. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. * Corbin v. Loftus, No. 8:15-cv-02118-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 10, 2015). We also deny Corbin’s petitions for a writ of mandamus and his pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Corbin seeks to challenge the removal of another currently pending civil action, Corbin v. Lynch, No. 8:16-cv-01495-RWT (D. Md. May 18, 2016), his notice of appeal did not designate a decision or judgment in that case, see Fed. R, App. P, 3(c)(1)(B), and there has been no ruling by the district court on a motion to remand.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.