U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Starsha Sewell v. John Howard, Sr.

Starsha Sewell v. John Howard, Sr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 28, 2016

Starsha Sewell v. John Howard, Sr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1758

STARSHA SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN HOWARD, SR., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-02736-JFM)

Submitted: November 14, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders returning documents to Sewell on the ground that the case is closed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Howard, No. 8:12-cv-02736-JFM (D. Md. June 14 & 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.