U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

James Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC

James Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 28, 2016

James Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2578

JAMES C. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BIG APPLE DELI, LLC, trading as Crabapples Delicatessen; BRUCE R. DERRICK, individual, trading as Crabapples Delicatessen, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03042-GLR)

Submitted: November 18, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brennan C. McCarthy, BRENNAN MCCARTHY & ASSOCIATES, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Richard W. Evans, Amy Leete Leone, MCCARTHY WILSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: James C. Martin appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) for insufficient service of process.

We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to dismiss the complaint. See Cardenas v. City of Chi., 646 F.3d 1001, 1005 (7th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-03042-GLR (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2015). However, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), we modify the district court’s order to a dismissal without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.