George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6838

GEORGE CLEVELAND, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE DANIEL D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina; KAREN C. RATIGAN, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:15-cv-04384-RBH)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Cleveland v. Hall, No. 6:15-cv-04384-RBH (D.S.C. May 18, 2016).

We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed his

informal brief, and we dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished