George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall
George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6838
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE DANIEL D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina; KAREN C. RATIGAN, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:15-cv-04384-RBH)
Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Cleveland v. Hall, No. 6:15-cv-04384-RBH (D.S.C. May 18, 2016).
We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed his
informal brief, and we dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished