John Stritzinger v. Samuel Asiedu

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

John Stritzinger v. Samuel Asiedu

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1810

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SAMUEL ASIEDU; SCOTT MATOSCO; SUSAN ZELENIAK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-05111-TLW)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v.

Asiedu, No. 3:15-cv-05111-TLW (D.S.C. June 23, 2016). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished