Brandon Watson v. City of Aberdeen
Brandon Watson v. City of Aberdeen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1573
BRANDON WATSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CITY OF ABERDEEN; ABERDEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC. RAUL FOSMARK; DETECTIVE JOHN DIVEL; CPL. CRAIG GENTILE; HARRY FREDRICK BUDNICK; OFFICER THADDEUS TOMLINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00307-JKB)
Submitted: November 18, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Fred Cohen, LAW OFFICES OF JAY FRED COHEN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel Karp, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Brandon Watson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Watson v. Aberdeen, No. 1:15-cv-00307-JKB (D. Md. Apr. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.