George Bratton v. State of North Carolina
George Bratton v. State of North Carolina
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2028
GEORGE ANDREW BRATTON, an individual,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
THE ESTATE OF GEENA GEE BRATTON, Decedent,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, a Business Entity or Governmental Agency; PAT MCCORY, Gov., an Individual; MECKLENBURG COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, (DSS), a Business Entity or Governmental Agency; PEGGY EAGAN, Director of DSS, an individual; CHRIS TAYLOR, badge #211 in his individual and official capacity of Lieutenant; MCDOWELL COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; CEDERBROOK RESIDENTIAL CENTER, a business entity; THE ESTATE OF HENRY ROBERT BRATTON, JR., Deceased; MARIAN DIEBEL-BRATTON, individual; ARLENE BROKAW, individual and in her official capacity; MCEWEN FUNERAL SERVICE PINEVILLE CHAPEL CITY, a business entity; NORTH CAROLINA ADOPTION AGENCY, a business entity or governmental agency,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00021-FL)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Andrew Bratton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
George Andrew Bratton appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bratton’s motion to
assign counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bratton v. North Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-00021-FL
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished