United States v. Joseph Speight

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Joseph Speight

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH DANIEL SPEIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00426-WO-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Daniel Speight, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Daniel Speight appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Speight,

No. 1:10-cr-00426-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 2016). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished