United States v. George Cabel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. George Cabel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7166

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GEORGE THOMAS CABEL, a/k/a PY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00173-TDS-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Thomas Cabel, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Thomas Cabel appeals from the district court’s order

granting his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion. * We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Cabel, No. 1:97-cr-00173-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18,

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted Cabel’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Cabel’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished