Darron Jones v. Cranford
Darron Jones v. Cranford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7306
DARRON JERMAINE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRANFORD,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON; SMITH; YOUNG; BARRETT; HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) action against Cranford. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v.
Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016). We
deny Jones’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished