Darron Jones v. Cranford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Darron Jones v. Cranford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7306

DARRON JERMAINE JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CRANFORD,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON; SMITH; YOUNG; BARRETT; HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) action against Cranford. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v.

Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016). We

deny Jones’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished