Charles Tyson v. Alan Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charles Tyson v. Alan Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6989

CHARLES KEVIN BRUCE TYSON, a/k/a Charles Tyson,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ALAN WILSON, Attorney General SC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:16-cv-01232-DCN)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Tyson v. Wilson, No. 6:16-cv-01232-DCN (D.S.C.

June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished