United States v. Jamal Alfred
United States v. Jamal Alfred
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jamal H. Alfred appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Alfred, No. 3:03-cr-00017-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Alfred's § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Alfred’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.