Sidney Harr v. Richard Brodhead

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sidney Harr v. Richard Brodhead

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1846

SIDNEY B. HARR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, President; DUKE UNIVERSITY, c/o Pamela J. Bernard, General Counsel; ASSOCIATED PRESS; DAVID F. LEVI, Dean,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00304-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sidney B. Harr appeals the district court’s order

dismissing on res judicata grounds his civil action against

Defendants, and imposing a prefiling injunction against and

sanctions on Harr. We have reviewed the record and found no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Harr v. Brodhead, No. 1:16-cv-00304-

CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished