Ronnie Alston v. Thomas Dore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ronnie Alston v. Thomas Dore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1894

RONNIE LEE ALSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THOMAS P. DORE, Substitute Trustees, et al.; CHARLES HIRSCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02635-GJH)

Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Dore, No. 8:15-

cv-02635-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2015, July 29, 2016). We deny

Alston’s motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished