Ronnie Alston v. Thomas Dore
Ronnie Alston v. Thomas Dore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1894
RONNIE LEE ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS P. DORE, Substitute Trustees, et al.; CHARLES HIRSCH, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02635-GJH)
Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Dore, No. 8:15- cv-02635-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2015, July 29, 2016). We deny Alston’s motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.