U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Ronnie Alston v. Arastoo Yazdani

Ronnie Alston v. Arastoo Yazdani
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2016

Ronnie Alston v. Arastoo Yazdani

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2015

RONNIE LEE ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MD ARASTOO YAZDANI; DR. ARASTOO YAZDANI; DRS. ANTON MINASSIAN; DRS. SLAVKA MINASSIAN; MD RASHEED A. ABASSI; DORTHY KENMACIA, Pharmacist, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02660-GJH)

Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Raymond Booth, Larry D. McAfee, GLEASON, FLYNN, EMIG & FOGLEMAN, CHARTERED, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s order orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim and granting in part and denying in part his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Yazdani, No. 8:15-cv-02660-GJH (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2015; filed Aug. 5, 2016 & entered Aug. 8, 2016). We deny Alston’s motion to strike a response brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.