Die Blaise v. Sandra Harris

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Die Blaise v. Sandra Harris, 672 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2016)

Die Blaise v. Sandra Harris

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Die K. Blaise seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing part of his civil *254 complaint with prejudice and dismissing the remainder without prejudice. Blaise has since filed an amended civil complaint raising the.claims dismissed without prejudice, and that action remains pending with the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Blaise seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Dr. Die K. BLAISE, Pharm. D, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Sandra HARRIS, Pharm. D.; Vibra Hospital of Richmond, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished