Muhammad v. Mathena

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Muhammad v. Mathena, 627 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2016)

Muhammad v. Mathena

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER . CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, .we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00142-JLK-RSB, 2015 WL 4274280 (W.D.Va. July 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Malcolm MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff—Appellant v. R. MATHENA, Warden J. Warath, Assistant Warden A. David Robinson, Chief of Operations J. Owens, Property Officer Shortridge, Mailroom Supervisor Major Gallahart
Status
Published