Bardes v. Auld

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Bardes v. Auld, 629 F. App'x 570 (4th Cir. 2016)

Bardes v. Auld

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Ms civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH, 2015 WL 5796466 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
David A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer v. L. Patrick AULD, Magistrate Judge Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior U.S. District Judge Robert Carr, Ex-Magistrate Judge, in their individual and official capacities US Courts United States of America US Department of Justice John and Jane Does
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published