Martin v. Miley
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying relief on Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Miley, No. 6:13-cv-03516-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
• AFFIRMED,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Henry W. MARTIN, Jr. v. Cpt Myecha MILEY, and William R. Byars John R. Pate Arthur A. Jordan McKenndly Newton Robert E. Ward Jon Ozmint Dennis Patterson Daniel Murphy David M. Tatarsky Lt J. Carujo Lt J. Carter Robert Orr Lt James Rump Captain E.J. Miller Dr. Thomas Bynse Lt Varlease Black Cpl L. Jenkins M. Hudson S. Singlaton, Dho Cpl T. Simpson Mr. McQueen P. Smith A. Hollman Helen Freeman Thomas Scott Cpt E. James Tanya A. Gee V. Claire Allen John C. Few Wayne C. McCabe Jill Beattie Jeannette Mack Francine Bauchman Patty Britt Posey James S. Sligh, Jr. Dr. Rowland Gregory S. Line Charlotte Smith Ellen Goodwin Russell Rush Jim Crosby Susan Barden Virginia Crocker Pam Smith Laketa Dika Deborah B. Durden
- Status
- Published