Mack v. Burgess

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 9, 2016

Mack v. Burgess, 632 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Willie Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Burgess, No. 9:15-cv-02128-DCN, 2015 WL 4885212 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

We conclude that the district court’s order is final and appealable. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015).

Reference

Full Case Name: John Willie MACK, Jr. v. John David BURGESS, Spartanburg City Police, in his Individual and Official Capacities George David Reeves, Custodian of Evidence for the Spartanburg City Police Department, in his Individual and Official Capacities. Manuel J. Ortuno, Forensics Analyst of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, in his Individual and Official Capacities Anthony C. Leibert, Solicitor and State Attorney for Spartanburg County/City, in his Individual and Official Capacities Barry Joe Barnette, Solicitor and State Attorney for Spartanburg County/City, in his Individual and Official Capacities
Status: Published