U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

In re Kerr

In re Kerr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2016 · Gregory, Hamilton, Motz
633 F. App'x 167

In re Kerr

Opinion of the Court

*168Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.