Muhammad v. Jackson
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Reid, No. 1:13-cv-00339-LO-TCB (E.D.Va. Apr. 24 & July 31, 2013; Aug. 22, 2014; June 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Malcolm MUHAMMAD, and Eric L. Reid v. Chaplain JACKSON, and Eddie Pearson, individually and official capacity R. Wallace, individually and official capacity Wendy S. Hobbs, individually and official capacity
- Status
- Published