U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Bell

United States v. Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2016 · Gregory, Hamilton, Motz
633 F. App'x 191

United States v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in.this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Kenroy Bell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bell, No. 5:09-cr-00202-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.