U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Carillo-Tamayo

United States v. Carillo-Tamayo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2016 · Gregory, Hamilton, Motz
633 F. App'x 192

United States v. Carillo-Tamayo

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yulian Carillo-Tamayo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carillo-Tamayo, No. 5:12-cr-00563-MBS-2 (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.