Al-Mujahidin v. Harouff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Al-Mujahidin v. Harouff, 633 F. App'x 593 (4th Cir. 2016)

Al-Mujahidin v. Harouff

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Al-Mujahidin seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Al-Mujahi-din seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Muhammad AL-MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton v. Daniel HAROUFF Daniel Bush D. Arrowood Cathy Jones Michael McCall, in their indiv capacities SCDC, in its official capacity
Status
Published