King v. City of Norfolk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
King v. City of Norfolk, 633 F. App'x 841 (4th Cir. 2016)

King v. City of Norfolk

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leroy F. King appeals the district court’s orders dismissing for failure to state a claim King’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying King’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:15-cv-00174-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. Aug. 24, 2015 & Oct. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not' aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Leroy F. KING v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Status
Published