U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Simms v. Hagel

Simms v. Hagel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 21, 2016 · King, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
641 F. App'x 268

Simms v. Hagel

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheila C. Simms appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint raising claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Hagel, No. *2693:14-cv-60433-REP, 2015 WL 5020894 (E.D.Va. Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.