U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

In re Randolph

In re Randolph
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 22, 2016 · Davis, Harris, Niemeyer
642 F. App'x 204

In re Randolph

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order issuing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion issuing the injunction. Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we grant Randolph’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.