U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Banks

United States v. Banks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2016 · Davis, Duncan, Gregory
643 F. App'x 251

United States v. Banks

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emanuel Sammy Banks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Banks, No. 5:13-cr-00037-FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.