U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Harshaw

United States v. Harshaw
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 26, 2016 · Keenan, King, Wilkinson
647 F. App'x 168

United States v. Harshaw

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Harshaw, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C, § 3682(c) (2012), and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harshaw, No. 5:14-cr-00027-1 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.