Ephraim v. Hogsten
Ephraim v. Hogsten
647 F. App'x 217
Ephraim v. Hogsten
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lionell Elijah Ephraim appeals the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ephraim v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-04701 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.