U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Leyshon v. Commissioner

Leyshon v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 20, 2016 · Diaz, Harris, Shedd
649 F. App'x 299

Counsel

Curtis Edward Leyshon, Appellant Pro Se. Caroline D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Bridget M. Rowan, Clint A. Carpenter, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Olivia H. Rembach, Amy Dyar Seals, Internal Revenue Service, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Leyshon v. Commissioner

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis E. Leyshon appeals the tax court’s order sustaining the Commissioner’s assessment of a deficiency and penalty with respect to his 2010 federal income tax liability and imposing a penalty pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6673(a)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Leyshon v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 020983-13, 109 T.C.M. (CCH) 1535 (U.S. Tax Ct. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.