U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Amestica

United States v. Amestica
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2016 · King, Motz, Wynn
667 F. App'x 60

United States v. Amestica

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ismael Diaz Amestica appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to compel a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Amestica, No. 2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.