United States v. Amestica
United States v. Amestica
667 F. App'x 60
United States v. Amestica
Opinion of the Court
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ismael Diaz Amestica appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to compel a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Amestica, No. 2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.