U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 25, 2016 · Agee, Shedd, Wynn
667 F. App'x 399

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm. Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.