U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Conrad

United States v. Conrad
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 22, 2016 · Keenan, King, Wilkinson
668 F. App'x 53

United States v. Conrad

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Conrad, No. 1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 11 & entered Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.