Griffin v. Harrison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Griffin v. Harrison, 669 F. App'x 660 (4th Cir. 2016)
Duncán, Niemeyer, Wynn

Griffin v. Harrison

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing, in part, Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Grif*661fin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Raymond GRIFFIN v. Donnie HARRISON Officer Gilliam Officer Lamar Sergeant Bridges Officer Bey-Adams Sergeant Smith Officer Hammonds John And Jane Doe, and Captain Steinbeck
Status
Published