Clair v. Doe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 21, 2016

Clair v. Doe, 670 F. App'x 774 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-cv-00713-PWG, 2016 WL 374097 (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles CLAIR v. John DOE, Clerk of the States Attorney's Office of St. Mary's County, MD John Doe, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary's County, MD, and Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr., Attorney Peter O'Neil
Status: Published